Ultimate Level Munafiq: Lewd Comments Are “Halal,” But a Pet-Friendly Mall Is “Unislamic”?
In yet another display of jaw-dropping hypocrisy, a Malaysian man on Threads (@amran.hassan70) sparked outrage by urging Muslims to boycott Sunway Square Mall simply because it’s pet-friendly—focusing, of course, on the “impurity” of dogs.
“If this is true, it will make Muslims feel uncomfortable,” he whined. “So for Muslims, the choice of mall is our choice. Just forgo it.”
Fast-forward to the backlash: Netizens dug up his comment history, revealing screenshots of him shamelessly objectifying women with gems like “Nice bobbs” and “Nice beautiful and good shape”—posted just weeks earlier on women’s photos.
This is the same “pious” warrior terrified of accidentally brushing against a leashed dog in a mall, yet perfectly comfortable sexually harassing strangers online.
This is munafiq at its peak—ultimate level. What twisted logic declares ogling and lewd remarks toward women “halal”, while a family-friendly mall catering to pet lovers is suddenly “unislamic” and worthy of a boycott? In his eyes, a well-behaved dog is a grave sin, but reducing women to body parts is fine?
Critics rightly tore into this contradiction, mocking how someone so “afraid” of dogs has no issue being a creep online.
As one commenter put it: even a dog is more holy than this type of behavior.
Real Islamic teachings emphasize compassion toward all creatures—God’s creations.
Remember the famous hadith where a prostitute from the Children of Israel was forgiven her sins by Allah simply for giving water to a thirsty, panting dog using her shoe?
That small act of mercy earned divine forgiveness.
Or consider Surah Al-Kahf in the Quran: the faithful youths hid in a cave for centuries, protected by Allah, with their loyal dog (traditionally named Qitmir) stretched out at the entrance, guarding them faithfully. Dogs aren’t inherently evil; kindness to animals is rewarded.
This mall is designed for pet lovers—who have limited options in Malaysia—with dedicated zones like a pet playground and lakeside park. Pets must be in carriers or strollers; it’s not chaos.
If you’re uncomfortable?
There are hundreds of other malls in the Klang Valley. No need to scream “Tanah Melayu” or play the victim over one premium spot targeting civilized, high-end crowds.
When fanatics rant about dogs but stay silent on real sins like corruption, adultery, or verbal abuse, they forget the Prophet’s era: differences were settled with evidence and dalil, not curses and boycotts.
This petty outrage over one mall—while ignoring bigger issues—only embarrasses the community.
Even Turkish Airlines, an airline from a Muslim-majority country, allows dogs in the cabin with passengers. They’re chill about it.
And now, in a hilarious twist of irony, these same fanatics are screeching for a full-on boycott of Sunway Square Mall.
Spare us the drama—there’s zero need to boycott.
This isn’t your average neighborhood mall; it’s a high-end, premium destination in the heart of Sunway City, deliberately targeting a sophisticated, civilized, high-class, high-IQ crowd: pet lovers with disposable income, urban professionals, families seeking quality experiences, and discerning shoppers who value inclusivity and modern amenities.
Don’t kid yourselves (“jangan perasaan”) into thinking the mall ever needed or wanted your patronage.
You’re simply not the target market.
Sunway Square is built for those who can afford the upscale brands, gourmet dining, and lakeside vibes—swiping with government SARA aid or scraping together change for parking won’t cut it here.
A bunch of debt-laden fools, drowning in loans and barely able to pay tolls, shouting “boycott” from afar?
It’s comedy gold—pure entertainment.
Calls for boycott over a high-end mall you’ll likely never afford anyway—swiping with government aid won’t cover the parking, let alone shopping.
History shows: every “boycott” these types push fails spectacularly—the targeted businesses thrive, earning millions.
But everything they support?
This petty outrage only highlights the pattern: every time these types rally behind “pious” or “exclusive” ventures with the wrong target market or flawed execution, disaster follows.
Remember “Low Yat 2″—the Mara Digital malls meant as Bumiputera-only alternatives to Plaza Low Yat? They struggled from the start with low footfall and closed down quietly.
Or Malakat Mall, the “Muslim and Bumiputera-exclusive” concept in Cyberjaya that became a viral “ghost mall” before shutting its doors for good in 2024 amid mismanagement and zero buzz.
Rayani Air, the Sharia-compliant airline pushed as a “halal” option? It crashed and burned after just four months in 2016 due to financial woes and operational failures.
GISBH-linked businesses? Collapsed under scandals, raids, and asset freezes.
Meanwhile, the businesses they boycott?
They thrive, raking in millions while expanding. History proves it: selective outrage backfires spectacularly.
The “boycotted” spots stand stronger, attracting the real spending power.
If precedent is anything to go by—and it is—by all means, please boycott Sunway Square.
It’ll only cement its status as an exclusive haven for the crowd it actually wants.
True Islam preaches love, compassion, and tolerance for all creations.
This selective fanaticism?
It’s more syaitan than any dog could ever be. Low-level idiocy dressed as piety.
And then there’s the absolute low-point stupidity: some brain-dead idiot dragged “Tanah Melayu” into this, as if a pet-friendly mall is somehow an assault on Malay land and sovereignty.
Seriously—what the hell does “Tanah Melayu” have to do with a shopping mall allowing leashed dogs?
Dogs have been roaming this peninsula for thousands of years, long before any human ancestors—Malay, Chinese, Indian, or otherwise—ever set foot here as dominant groups.
Archaeological evidence shows canines living alongside indigenous Orang Asli communities way before the arrival of Malay kingdoms.
Yet here we have these clowns screaming “Tanah Melayu!” over… dogs in a mall?
“Dengan anjing pun hendak jerit Tanah Melayu ke?”
“Dengan anjing pun nak claim siapa pendatang dan siapa penduduk asal?”
“Dengan anjing pun perlu jerit ‘Hidup Melayu’?”
This isn’t piety or patriotism—it’s rock-bottom idiocy.
You’re not defending Malay rights; you’re embarrassing them by turning a harmless pet policy into a racist, xenophobic tantrum.
Even over a dog, you want to play the “pendatang” card?
Even against four-legged creatures that were here before your great-great-grandparents?
This mentality is so toxic and low-level that, in the eyes of God, you’re behaving worse than syaitan disguised as a pious warrior.
Real Islam calls for compassion toward all of Allah’s creations—not weaponizing “Tanah Melayu” as an excuse to hate on pets, pet owners, or anyone who doesn’t fit your narrow worldview.
If you’re that triggered by dogs in one premium mall, stay home.
The rest of us will shop in peace, while you scream at shadows and imaginary invaders—canine division.
Source : The Rakyat Post
