PH’s Johor Loss Signals the Beginning of the End for Anwar
https://www.thecoverage.my/9810/phs-johor-loss-signals-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-anwar
https://www.thecoverage.my/9810/phs-johor-loss-signals-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-anwar
The Coverage
PH’s Johor Loss Signals the Beginning of the End for Anwar | The Coverage
According to Finance Twitter , you know a government is increasingly authoritarian, corrupt, and arrogant when it starts cracking down on freedom of expression by
❤3👍1
Tony Pua, Stop the Emotional Blackmail – We’re Not Your Vote Slaves
Tony Pua, enough with the emotional blackmail.
The rakyat voted for PH, yet under the Madani government you preside over, Zahid Hamidi walked away with a DNAA. Spare us the tired scare tactics: “If you don’t vote PH, Zahid will become Prime Minister.”
That line is not only insulting — it’s intellectually bankrupt.
Have you conveniently forgotten your own words?
On 25 April 2025, Anthony Loke praised the BN-PH cooperation formula as the way to advance the nation. On 22 September 2025, he declared DAP is ready to continue working with BN, only demanding they keep all their won seats. Liew Chin Tong, on 29 September 2024, insisted PH-BN cooperation was essential for the people’s welfare.
Whenever it suited you, BN was suddenly respectable: “Demi rakyat, demi kesejahteraan, demi negara.” Now that BN is no longer willing to prop you up, the script flips and they’re the existential threat again.
The logic is embarrassingly transparent: it’s perfectly fine for BN to work with PH, but treasonous if BN chooses anyone else. You treat political alliances like a one-way street you alone control.
Stop pretending Anwar is morally superior to Zahid.
To many Malaysians, they are cut from the same cloth — both veterans of the same rotten system. Progressive voters are not your servants, your property, or your guaranteed vote bank. You do not own our ballots. We lent them to you. We can take them back.
Where is the RM33.3 billion in overpaid income tax that belongs to the people? Why the deafening silence on that?
Look at the numbers you cannot spin away.
Under previous BN governments, non-Malay intake into public universities hovered between 25-35%. Under PN’s 33 months, it was 20-25%.
Yet in 2025/2026, under your DAP-Anwar Madani administration, public universities admitted a staggering 228,930 Bumiputera students against only 29,106 non-Bumiputera — a mere 11.3% for taxpayers who also fund these institutions.
Why did the Selangor PH government issue restrictive non-Muslim religious guidelines that even the PAS-led states never imposed?
Why is funding for SJKC and SJKT schools so measly while RM200 million is casually splashed on international aid?
And the height of hypocrisy: you release the “tiger” (Zahid) with a DNAA under your watch, then demand we live in terror of it.
All while every DAP leader stays conveniently silent and tone-deaf. What kind of twisted logic is this? You expect us to fear the monster you yourselves empowered?
PH does not deserve our votes simply because the alternative is imperfect.
You must earn them through competence, fairness, and integrity — not guilt-tripping and selective outrage.
Stop taking progressive voters for granted. The age of automatic loyalty is over. Deliver results, or prepare to be replaced.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18UMJCGsPR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Tony Pua, enough with the emotional blackmail.
The rakyat voted for PH, yet under the Madani government you preside over, Zahid Hamidi walked away with a DNAA. Spare us the tired scare tactics: “If you don’t vote PH, Zahid will become Prime Minister.”
That line is not only insulting — it’s intellectually bankrupt.
Have you conveniently forgotten your own words?
On 25 April 2025, Anthony Loke praised the BN-PH cooperation formula as the way to advance the nation. On 22 September 2025, he declared DAP is ready to continue working with BN, only demanding they keep all their won seats. Liew Chin Tong, on 29 September 2024, insisted PH-BN cooperation was essential for the people’s welfare.
Whenever it suited you, BN was suddenly respectable: “Demi rakyat, demi kesejahteraan, demi negara.” Now that BN is no longer willing to prop you up, the script flips and they’re the existential threat again.
The logic is embarrassingly transparent: it’s perfectly fine for BN to work with PH, but treasonous if BN chooses anyone else. You treat political alliances like a one-way street you alone control.
Stop pretending Anwar is morally superior to Zahid.
To many Malaysians, they are cut from the same cloth — both veterans of the same rotten system. Progressive voters are not your servants, your property, or your guaranteed vote bank. You do not own our ballots. We lent them to you. We can take them back.
Where is the RM33.3 billion in overpaid income tax that belongs to the people? Why the deafening silence on that?
Look at the numbers you cannot spin away.
Under previous BN governments, non-Malay intake into public universities hovered between 25-35%. Under PN’s 33 months, it was 20-25%.
Yet in 2025/2026, under your DAP-Anwar Madani administration, public universities admitted a staggering 228,930 Bumiputera students against only 29,106 non-Bumiputera — a mere 11.3% for taxpayers who also fund these institutions.
Why did the Selangor PH government issue restrictive non-Muslim religious guidelines that even the PAS-led states never imposed?
Why is funding for SJKC and SJKT schools so measly while RM200 million is casually splashed on international aid?
And the height of hypocrisy: you release the “tiger” (Zahid) with a DNAA under your watch, then demand we live in terror of it.
All while every DAP leader stays conveniently silent and tone-deaf. What kind of twisted logic is this? You expect us to fear the monster you yourselves empowered?
PH does not deserve our votes simply because the alternative is imperfect.
You must earn them through competence, fairness, and integrity — not guilt-tripping and selective outrage.
Stop taking progressive voters for granted. The age of automatic loyalty is over. Deliver results, or prepare to be replaced.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18UMJCGsPR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍5❤1
Sanusi, Your Grandfather Came From China Too — Stop the Racial Politics
Don’t forget your own grandfather came from China.
What kind of racial politics are you trying to play?
What exactly do you mean by “Cina got China, India got India”?
You are only a third-generation Malaysian. Your grandfather was from China. Meanwhile, many Chinese and Indians in this country are already fourth- or fifth-generation. They hold blue ICs. China will not take them. India will not take them. They are Malaysians.
While we’re on the subject of origins — ask Zahid Hamidi where both his parents and grandparents originally came from.
You talk about equity, yet you conveniently ignore that non-Bumiputera equity has already fallen by more than 45% since 1970 — from roughly 70% to about 25% today — and continues to shrink. Stop pretending that the shortcomings of any community are somehow the fault of the minorities in this country.
More than 90% of civil servants are Bumiputera. In the 2025/2026 public university intake, more than 89% of places went to Bumiputera students while non-Bumiputera received only 11%.
In Malaysia’s T20 income group, the household breakdown is 53.81% Bumiputera, 37.05% Chinese, and 8.80% Indian.
Stop playing racial politics.
Learn from the Prophet Muhammad , who stated clearly that an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, a non-Arab has no superiority over an Arab, a white person has no superiority over a black person, and a black person has no superiority over a white person — except by piety and good deeds.
Islam regards racial and tribal arrogance as a remnant of jahiliyyah that must be abandoned.
“Tanah Melayu” no longer exists as a formal country.
It became the Federation of Malaya, which later joined with other territories to form Malaysia.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AxrdHMS3n/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Don’t forget your own grandfather came from China.
What kind of racial politics are you trying to play?
What exactly do you mean by “Cina got China, India got India”?
You are only a third-generation Malaysian. Your grandfather was from China. Meanwhile, many Chinese and Indians in this country are already fourth- or fifth-generation. They hold blue ICs. China will not take them. India will not take them. They are Malaysians.
While we’re on the subject of origins — ask Zahid Hamidi where both his parents and grandparents originally came from.
You talk about equity, yet you conveniently ignore that non-Bumiputera equity has already fallen by more than 45% since 1970 — from roughly 70% to about 25% today — and continues to shrink. Stop pretending that the shortcomings of any community are somehow the fault of the minorities in this country.
More than 90% of civil servants are Bumiputera. In the 2025/2026 public university intake, more than 89% of places went to Bumiputera students while non-Bumiputera received only 11%.
In Malaysia’s T20 income group, the household breakdown is 53.81% Bumiputera, 37.05% Chinese, and 8.80% Indian.
Stop playing racial politics.
Learn from the Prophet Muhammad , who stated clearly that an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, a non-Arab has no superiority over an Arab, a white person has no superiority over a black person, and a black person has no superiority over a white person — except by piety and good deeds.
Islam regards racial and tribal arrogance as a remnant of jahiliyyah that must be abandoned.
“Tanah Melayu” no longer exists as a formal country.
It became the Federation of Malaya, which later joined with other territories to form Malaysia.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AxrdHMS3n/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍4
Sanusi, Your Grandfather Came From China Too — Stop the Racial Politics
https://www.thecoverage.my/9820/sanusi-your-grandfather-came-from-china-too-stop-the-racial-politics
https://www.thecoverage.my/9820/sanusi-your-grandfather-came-from-china-too-stop-the-racial-politics
The Coverage
Sanusi, Your Grandfather Came From China Too — Stop the Racial Politics | The Coverage
Don’t forget your own grandfather came from China. What kind of racial politics are you trying to play? What exactly do you mean by “Cina
👍4
Hadi Awang’s Daughter-in-Law Is Chinese — Stop the Pendatang Rhetoric Madness
Malaysia Is for Malaysians.
Hadi Awang’s daughter-in-law is Chinese. Let that sink in. The same political ecosystem that weaponises “pendatang” every election cycle has intermarried with the very communities it otherises. This is not a gotcha for the sake of it. It is evidence that the rhetoric is selective, opportunistic, and hollow.
Every time elections approach, the same script returns: Indians belong to India, Chinese to China, Bugis to Sulawesi, Jawa to Java, Minang, Rawa and Kerinci to Sumatra, Aceh to Aceh.
Suddenly Mahathir’s roots in Kerala become relevant. Sanusi’s grandfather from China is whispered about. Zahid Hamidi’s father from Yogyakarta is noted. Some can even be traced to Taiwan or Yunnan.
The list is endless and the point is always the same: create distance, manufacture suspicion, and extract political capital.
When does this end?
Malaysians only have Malaysia. The people being labelled were born here. They will die here. This is their motherland. There is no mass return ticket to India, China, Indonesia or anywhere else.
Treating citizens as temporary guests is not patriotism. It is political arson.
Suffering is not exclusive to any one community.
When one group is struggling, others are too.
The claim that an entire community is rich because a handful of individuals succeeded is lazy and dishonest.
31.5% of Chinese households and 45.5% of Indian households are B40.
38.6% of Chinese households and 38.5% of Indian households are M40.
These are not the numbers of a privileged class living off others.
They are the numbers of ordinary Malaysians facing the same cost-of-living pressures as everyone else.
Look at public university intake. Chinese and Indian students combined made up only about 11% of the latest intake despite comprising roughly 30% of the population and contributing disproportionately to the tax base.
That is not “dominance.” That is under-representation dressed up as grievance.
Look at the money. Non-Islamic houses of worship — Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist, Christian — share a total of RM50 million a year.
That is one-quarter of the RM200 million Malaysia has spent on international aid in a comparable period. Priorities are revealed by budgets, not by speeches.
The wealth of certain communities was not stolen by minorities. It has been extracted, concentrated, and protected by elite networks that use race and religion as tools to keep their own communities divided and dependent. The real theft is not ethnic.
It is political.
We cannot keep living in a recycled past while pretending it is national defence.
The people born on this soil, who pay taxes here, raise children here, and will be buried here, are Malaysians.
Full stop.
Malaysia is for Malaysians. The rest is election theatre, and it is long past time the audience stopped clapping.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HPfBLr2Da/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Malaysia Is for Malaysians.
Hadi Awang’s daughter-in-law is Chinese. Let that sink in. The same political ecosystem that weaponises “pendatang” every election cycle has intermarried with the very communities it otherises. This is not a gotcha for the sake of it. It is evidence that the rhetoric is selective, opportunistic, and hollow.
Every time elections approach, the same script returns: Indians belong to India, Chinese to China, Bugis to Sulawesi, Jawa to Java, Minang, Rawa and Kerinci to Sumatra, Aceh to Aceh.
Suddenly Mahathir’s roots in Kerala become relevant. Sanusi’s grandfather from China is whispered about. Zahid Hamidi’s father from Yogyakarta is noted. Some can even be traced to Taiwan or Yunnan.
The list is endless and the point is always the same: create distance, manufacture suspicion, and extract political capital.
When does this end?
Malaysians only have Malaysia. The people being labelled were born here. They will die here. This is their motherland. There is no mass return ticket to India, China, Indonesia or anywhere else.
Treating citizens as temporary guests is not patriotism. It is political arson.
Suffering is not exclusive to any one community.
When one group is struggling, others are too.
The claim that an entire community is rich because a handful of individuals succeeded is lazy and dishonest.
31.5% of Chinese households and 45.5% of Indian households are B40.
38.6% of Chinese households and 38.5% of Indian households are M40.
These are not the numbers of a privileged class living off others.
They are the numbers of ordinary Malaysians facing the same cost-of-living pressures as everyone else.
Look at public university intake. Chinese and Indian students combined made up only about 11% of the latest intake despite comprising roughly 30% of the population and contributing disproportionately to the tax base.
That is not “dominance.” That is under-representation dressed up as grievance.
Look at the money. Non-Islamic houses of worship — Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist, Christian — share a total of RM50 million a year.
That is one-quarter of the RM200 million Malaysia has spent on international aid in a comparable period. Priorities are revealed by budgets, not by speeches.
The wealth of certain communities was not stolen by minorities. It has been extracted, concentrated, and protected by elite networks that use race and religion as tools to keep their own communities divided and dependent. The real theft is not ethnic.
It is political.
We cannot keep living in a recycled past while pretending it is national defence.
The people born on this soil, who pay taxes here, raise children here, and will be buried here, are Malaysians.
Full stop.
Malaysia is for Malaysians. The rest is election theatre, and it is long past time the audience stopped clapping.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HPfBLr2Da/?mibextid=wwXIfr
❤10😁3
Anwar, will you finally apologise to that Indian student?
The Quota Didn’t Save You, Anwar. Neither Did Silencing That Girl
Three years ago at Kolej Matrikulasi Pulau Pinang, a young Indian student stood up and asked a straightforward question about the Bumiputera quota system.
She asked for a minute or two to explain so she would not be misinterpreted. You cut her off before she could finish. You interrupted her again. And again. The video shows a visibly shaken student stammering while the Prime Minister of Malaysia talked over her.
You then delivered the political calculation that has defined your government: abolish the quota system and “we will lose all the elections.”
Keep the system, you implied, and power is secure.
The system remains. The quotas are intact. And yet look at the scoreboard.
In Sabah you were reduced to a single seat.
In Johor, Barisan Nasional took 48 out of 56 seats while Pakatan Harapan collapsed to eight.
The progressive voters who believed your reform rhetoric watched you prioritise electoral arithmetic over the principle of fairness, only to see that arithmetic fail you anyway.
So the question is no longer theoretical.
You kept the system and still lost badly. The very cost you warned about has already been paid — by you.
The far greater cost, however, is being paid by the young Malaysians who are told that excellence is secondary to race, that their future must be subordinated to political survival.
You treated a student asking about her country’s education system as if she were a political enemy. You interrupted her, dismissed her, and wrapped the entire exchange in the language of electoral fear. That is not leadership. That is the behaviour of a man who confuses power with principle.
Will you now admit you were wrong on both counts?
That maintaining the quota did not protect your electoral position, and that silencing a young citizen was an abuse of the platform you hold?
Will you apologise to that Indian student for the way you handled her?
And will you apologise to the progressive voters who backed you in the hope of a fairer Malaysia and who have instead watched the same old excuses delivered with the same old interruptions?
The elections are already costing you.
The bigger loss is the one this country cannot afford: the quiet erosion of belief among its brightest young people that merit still matters.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14iysc8QscL/?mibextid=wwXIfr
The Quota Didn’t Save You, Anwar. Neither Did Silencing That Girl
Three years ago at Kolej Matrikulasi Pulau Pinang, a young Indian student stood up and asked a straightforward question about the Bumiputera quota system.
She asked for a minute or two to explain so she would not be misinterpreted. You cut her off before she could finish. You interrupted her again. And again. The video shows a visibly shaken student stammering while the Prime Minister of Malaysia talked over her.
You then delivered the political calculation that has defined your government: abolish the quota system and “we will lose all the elections.”
Keep the system, you implied, and power is secure.
The system remains. The quotas are intact. And yet look at the scoreboard.
In Sabah you were reduced to a single seat.
In Johor, Barisan Nasional took 48 out of 56 seats while Pakatan Harapan collapsed to eight.
The progressive voters who believed your reform rhetoric watched you prioritise electoral arithmetic over the principle of fairness, only to see that arithmetic fail you anyway.
So the question is no longer theoretical.
You kept the system and still lost badly. The very cost you warned about has already been paid — by you.
The far greater cost, however, is being paid by the young Malaysians who are told that excellence is secondary to race, that their future must be subordinated to political survival.
You treated a student asking about her country’s education system as if she were a political enemy. You interrupted her, dismissed her, and wrapped the entire exchange in the language of electoral fear. That is not leadership. That is the behaviour of a man who confuses power with principle.
Will you now admit you were wrong on both counts?
That maintaining the quota did not protect your electoral position, and that silencing a young citizen was an abuse of the platform you hold?
Will you apologise to that Indian student for the way you handled her?
And will you apologise to the progressive voters who backed you in the hope of a fairer Malaysia and who have instead watched the same old excuses delivered with the same old interruptions?
The elections are already costing you.
The bigger loss is the one this country cannot afford: the quiet erosion of belief among its brightest young people that merit still matters.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14iysc8QscL/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍6❤2
Negeri Sembilan Rejects Anthony Loke - Even Without BERSAMA, They Still Lost
From a 2,200-vote majority last time to a defeat by more than 688 votes this time. Not a narrow squeaker that can be spun.
A clear reversal. The DAP secretary-general and Transport Minister lost his own state seat in Chennah to a first-time MCA candidate. That is not noise. That is a verdict.
How long does Pakatan Harapan intend to stay delusional?
When they lost Sabah, the line was “only Sabah.”
When they lost Johor, the excuse became “BERSAMA split the votes.”
Now BERSAMA is absent in Negeri Sembilan — and they still lost badly.
The pattern is obvious.
Progressive voters who once formed their reliable base are either staying home or, in some cases, preferring to punish DAP by voting MCA rather than reward a party that takes their support as automatic.
People are voting to send a message. The message is rejection.
So what is the next excuse? When will they own the mistakes, the arrogance, and the failures instead of manufacturing fresh narratives?
Why continue treating progressive voters as a captive bank that can be ignored while the party contorts itself chasing conservative votes — only to issue ritual apologies later?
Voters do not owe anyone their support. Support is earned.
Taking it for granted while delivering the opposite of what was promised is not strategy; it is contempt.
Look at the priorities on display. Generous with RM200 million in overseas aid.
Far less so with non-Muslim places of worship — RM50 million to be shared across Buddhist, Taoist, Christian and Hindu institutions.
Public university enrolment for non-Bumiputera students still stuck around 11 percent. These are not abstract talking points.
They are lived realities that erode trust among the very communities PH claims to represent.
And the campaign style? Endless fear-mongering about Zahid, Najib, PAS, BERSAMA.
Scare the base instead of persuading them that you still deserve their votes. When the fear no longer works and the results arrive, the reflex is still deflection.
Negeri Sembilan is not an isolated anomaly. It is the latest data point in a longer slide. Sabah, Johor, now here. The voters are not confused.
The coalition that keeps explaining away each loss while refusing to confront its own performance is the one that appears confused.
Own the loss. Address the drift. Or keep inventing reasons why the electorate is wrong. The scoreboard is already clear.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FAGZM9QvL/?mibextid=wwXIfr
From a 2,200-vote majority last time to a defeat by more than 688 votes this time. Not a narrow squeaker that can be spun.
A clear reversal. The DAP secretary-general and Transport Minister lost his own state seat in Chennah to a first-time MCA candidate. That is not noise. That is a verdict.
How long does Pakatan Harapan intend to stay delusional?
When they lost Sabah, the line was “only Sabah.”
When they lost Johor, the excuse became “BERSAMA split the votes.”
Now BERSAMA is absent in Negeri Sembilan — and they still lost badly.
The pattern is obvious.
Progressive voters who once formed their reliable base are either staying home or, in some cases, preferring to punish DAP by voting MCA rather than reward a party that takes their support as automatic.
People are voting to send a message. The message is rejection.
So what is the next excuse? When will they own the mistakes, the arrogance, and the failures instead of manufacturing fresh narratives?
Why continue treating progressive voters as a captive bank that can be ignored while the party contorts itself chasing conservative votes — only to issue ritual apologies later?
Voters do not owe anyone their support. Support is earned.
Taking it for granted while delivering the opposite of what was promised is not strategy; it is contempt.
Look at the priorities on display. Generous with RM200 million in overseas aid.
Far less so with non-Muslim places of worship — RM50 million to be shared across Buddhist, Taoist, Christian and Hindu institutions.
Public university enrolment for non-Bumiputera students still stuck around 11 percent. These are not abstract talking points.
They are lived realities that erode trust among the very communities PH claims to represent.
And the campaign style? Endless fear-mongering about Zahid, Najib, PAS, BERSAMA.
Scare the base instead of persuading them that you still deserve their votes. When the fear no longer works and the results arrive, the reflex is still deflection.
Negeri Sembilan is not an isolated anomaly. It is the latest data point in a longer slide. Sabah, Johor, now here. The voters are not confused.
The coalition that keeps explaining away each loss while refusing to confront its own performance is the one that appears confused.
Own the loss. Address the drift. Or keep inventing reasons why the electorate is wrong. The scoreboard is already clear.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FAGZM9QvL/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍6❤4
11 Dead at RXZ 8.0, Zero at KL Rain Festival — Where’s the Outrage Now?
KL Rain Water Festival - 250,000 visitors at the flagship KL event. National multi-state total around 415,000. RM320.43 million in economic returns for KL alone, nearly RM392 million overall. Zero deaths. Zero major incidents.
KL Police Chief Datuk Fadil Marsus confirmed no untoward incidents despite the massive turnout. No alcohol-fuelled chaos. No body count.
RXZ Members 8.0 - 46 road accidents involving motorcyclists recorded from 30 July to last Sunday in Terengganu and related corridors. 11 dead. Last year’s RXZ 7.0 had 5 dead.
This year’s edition more than doubled the body count.
Almost triple the number of human deaths attributed to dogs in Malaysia so far in 2026 (4).
On top of the fatalities, police issued 1,850 summonses for various offences and seized 222 motorcycles during the event.
Economic benefit claimed? Practically zero beyond temporary petrol, food, and hotel spend that does not offset the funerals, hospital bills, and long-term trauma.
Yet certain political parties and politicians still prefer to “champion” the motorcycle gathering culture while treating a water music festival as the greater moral threat.
Where is the accountability speech now? Where are the urgent press conferences, the moral lectures, the demands for bans or “review”? Last year five dead. This year eleven. The silence is loud.
Just imagine one single death at the KL Rain Water Festival. The reaction would have been nuclear. Statements, investigations, political theatre, moral panic.
But eleven dead on the roads tied to a large-scale motorcycle event?
Suddenly the same voices discover the virtues of “personal responsibility” and “don’t politicise tragedy.”
So let’s ask the blunt questions:
Which event is more problematic?
Which produces the real troublemakers on public roads?
Which is demonstrably more dangerous in body count?
While some prefer to occupy the high moral ground and lecture about “decadence” and “Western culture,” police arrested 912 motorists for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs in the first five months of 2026 alone.
That is the everyday reality of impaired driving. Not a three-day water festival with zero fatalities.
One event delivered hundreds of millions in economic activity and zero corpses. The other delivered a rising death toll and political cover. The numbers are not subtle. The selective outrage is.
If politicians want to claim the moral high ground, they can start by treating eleven preventable road deaths with the same urgency they reserve for a music festival that killed no one.
Until then, the real question is not which event is more “problematic.” It is who is more comfortable looking the other way when the body count rises.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19GVJ4Sayd/?mibextid=wwXIfr
KL Rain Water Festival - 250,000 visitors at the flagship KL event. National multi-state total around 415,000. RM320.43 million in economic returns for KL alone, nearly RM392 million overall. Zero deaths. Zero major incidents.
KL Police Chief Datuk Fadil Marsus confirmed no untoward incidents despite the massive turnout. No alcohol-fuelled chaos. No body count.
RXZ Members 8.0 - 46 road accidents involving motorcyclists recorded from 30 July to last Sunday in Terengganu and related corridors. 11 dead. Last year’s RXZ 7.0 had 5 dead.
This year’s edition more than doubled the body count.
Almost triple the number of human deaths attributed to dogs in Malaysia so far in 2026 (4).
On top of the fatalities, police issued 1,850 summonses for various offences and seized 222 motorcycles during the event.
Economic benefit claimed? Practically zero beyond temporary petrol, food, and hotel spend that does not offset the funerals, hospital bills, and long-term trauma.
Yet certain political parties and politicians still prefer to “champion” the motorcycle gathering culture while treating a water music festival as the greater moral threat.
Where is the accountability speech now? Where are the urgent press conferences, the moral lectures, the demands for bans or “review”? Last year five dead. This year eleven. The silence is loud.
Just imagine one single death at the KL Rain Water Festival. The reaction would have been nuclear. Statements, investigations, political theatre, moral panic.
But eleven dead on the roads tied to a large-scale motorcycle event?
Suddenly the same voices discover the virtues of “personal responsibility” and “don’t politicise tragedy.”
So let’s ask the blunt questions:
Which event is more problematic?
Which produces the real troublemakers on public roads?
Which is demonstrably more dangerous in body count?
While some prefer to occupy the high moral ground and lecture about “decadence” and “Western culture,” police arrested 912 motorists for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs in the first five months of 2026 alone.
That is the everyday reality of impaired driving. Not a three-day water festival with zero fatalities.
One event delivered hundreds of millions in economic activity and zero corpses. The other delivered a rising death toll and political cover. The numbers are not subtle. The selective outrage is.
If politicians want to claim the moral high ground, they can start by treating eleven preventable road deaths with the same urgency they reserve for a music festival that killed no one.
Until then, the real question is not which event is more “problematic.” It is who is more comfortable looking the other way when the body count rises.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19GVJ4Sayd/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍7❤1
Where Is Akmal Salleh Now? From “Teach the Ah Pek” to Total Silence
Patriotism or Prejudice?
A woman posts an apology. A magnetic Jalur Gemilang on the back of her pickup ended up upside down. She explains it was not intentional — a car-wash worker reattached it the wrong way after it came off. She owns the mistake, corrects it, and moves on. No mob. No convoy. No “class” outside her house. No racial epithets. No political theatre.
Compare that with the old uncle in Penang last year. Same honest error while measuring a pole. Same immediate correction. Same apology.
The response then?
UMNO Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh labelled the men “traitors,” invited supporters from across the country to the shop at noon, and declared he would personally “teach these two ah pek how to put up the Malaysian flag.” Police reports piled up. Arrests followed. A march of hundreds was organised under the banner of salvaging national pride. Counter-protests formed. The episode was weaponised into racial and political content for days.
Where are the terpaling patriotik and the self-appointed flag experts this time? The selective silence is deafening. The same voices that treated a Chinese hardware shop owner’s mistake as a national emergency requiring public humiliation and physical presence at his doorstep have gone quiet the moment the owner is a Malay woman. No one is organising a field trip to her house to lecture her on correct orientation. No one is demanding the Attorney-General’s Chambers move at lightning speed. The outrage has a clear off-switch.
The pattern is consistent: escalate when the face is the “other,” de-escalate when it is not.
That is not patriotism. That is selective enforcement dressed up as love for the flag.
Akmal Salleh’s earlier performance did lasting damage. By turning an accidental display error into a racialised spectacle complete with threats of collective “education,” he taught ordinary Malaysians that flying the Jalur Gemilang carries risk.
Display it wrongly and you may face a political posse at your gate. Better not to risk it at all. Many now think twice before hanging the flag.
The symbol that was meant to unite has been turned, through political opportunism, into a source of anxiety.
Malaysia will not be the same.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DCTPbjbr7/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Patriotism or Prejudice?
A woman posts an apology. A magnetic Jalur Gemilang on the back of her pickup ended up upside down. She explains it was not intentional — a car-wash worker reattached it the wrong way after it came off. She owns the mistake, corrects it, and moves on. No mob. No convoy. No “class” outside her house. No racial epithets. No political theatre.
Compare that with the old uncle in Penang last year. Same honest error while measuring a pole. Same immediate correction. Same apology.
The response then?
UMNO Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh labelled the men “traitors,” invited supporters from across the country to the shop at noon, and declared he would personally “teach these two ah pek how to put up the Malaysian flag.” Police reports piled up. Arrests followed. A march of hundreds was organised under the banner of salvaging national pride. Counter-protests formed. The episode was weaponised into racial and political content for days.
Where are the terpaling patriotik and the self-appointed flag experts this time? The selective silence is deafening. The same voices that treated a Chinese hardware shop owner’s mistake as a national emergency requiring public humiliation and physical presence at his doorstep have gone quiet the moment the owner is a Malay woman. No one is organising a field trip to her house to lecture her on correct orientation. No one is demanding the Attorney-General’s Chambers move at lightning speed. The outrage has a clear off-switch.
The pattern is consistent: escalate when the face is the “other,” de-escalate when it is not.
That is not patriotism. That is selective enforcement dressed up as love for the flag.
Akmal Salleh’s earlier performance did lasting damage. By turning an accidental display error into a racialised spectacle complete with threats of collective “education,” he taught ordinary Malaysians that flying the Jalur Gemilang carries risk.
Display it wrongly and you may face a political posse at your gate. Better not to risk it at all. Many now think twice before hanging the flag.
The symbol that was meant to unite has been turned, through political opportunism, into a source of anxiety.
Malaysia will not be the same.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DCTPbjbr7/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍4
Is Johari the Worst MITI Minister So Far — And Why So Many Anti-EV Policies Under Him?
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AwENGRXw2/?mibextid=wwXIfr
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AwENGRXw2/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍2
Rafizi Lectures Sanusi on His 'Tanah Melayu' and Bumiputera Equity Rhetoric
https://www.facebook.com/share/1DYxnfc2g9/?mibextid=wwXIfr
https://www.facebook.com/share/1DYxnfc2g9/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍1
DAP Can’t Even Convince Its Own Delegates — How Can It Claim the Rakyat?
If DAP cannot even convince its own delegates, how can it possibly claim the support of the rakyat?
Out of 4,620 delegates, only 2,221 (48%) bothered to turn up and vote. More than half — 52% — stayed away. Of those who did attend, 1,857 (88%) voted for the party to remain in the Pakatan Harapan government.
But zoom out , that is only 1,857 out of 4,620 — roughly 40% of the entire delegate body. Forty percent.
Is this a silent protest? A quiet withdrawal of confidence?
When a party cannot even secure the backing of most of its own delegates, on what basis does it still claim to speak for millions of disappointed, frustrated Malaysians who feel cheated and betrayed?
The drama was unnecessary from the start.
If the intention was always to stay in Cabinet, then stay. Why the public threat to pull out unless reforms materialised within six months? Why the demand for an RCI into the corporate mafia after the Sabah humiliation?
Nine months later , zero meaningful reform, no RCI, and the party still uses a poorly attended congress vote as cover to remain.
Worse, after the circus, DAP now issues four reform demands to Anwar — yet conspicuously drops any call for that same RCI on the corporate mafia.
After this performance, what leverage remains?
By voting to stay, the party has handed Anwar a blank cheque. It has endorsed the government’s direction while shouting about principles it refuses to enforce. An empty vessel makes the most noise. All talk. No courage to walk.
When even your own delegates have lost faith, the rakyat has every reason to do the same.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/198QG8ic7S/?mibextid=wwXIfr
If DAP cannot even convince its own delegates, how can it possibly claim the support of the rakyat?
Out of 4,620 delegates, only 2,221 (48%) bothered to turn up and vote. More than half — 52% — stayed away. Of those who did attend, 1,857 (88%) voted for the party to remain in the Pakatan Harapan government.
But zoom out , that is only 1,857 out of 4,620 — roughly 40% of the entire delegate body. Forty percent.
Is this a silent protest? A quiet withdrawal of confidence?
When a party cannot even secure the backing of most of its own delegates, on what basis does it still claim to speak for millions of disappointed, frustrated Malaysians who feel cheated and betrayed?
The drama was unnecessary from the start.
If the intention was always to stay in Cabinet, then stay. Why the public threat to pull out unless reforms materialised within six months? Why the demand for an RCI into the corporate mafia after the Sabah humiliation?
Nine months later , zero meaningful reform, no RCI, and the party still uses a poorly attended congress vote as cover to remain.
Worse, after the circus, DAP now issues four reform demands to Anwar — yet conspicuously drops any call for that same RCI on the corporate mafia.
After this performance, what leverage remains?
By voting to stay, the party has handed Anwar a blank cheque. It has endorsed the government’s direction while shouting about principles it refuses to enforce. An empty vessel makes the most noise. All talk. No courage to walk.
When even your own delegates have lost faith, the rakyat has every reason to do the same.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/198QG8ic7S/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍5❤1🤣1